Probably, everyone thought about the paradox of Malevich’s “Black Square”.
You can’t think of anything easier than a black square. There is nothing easier than drawing a black square. Nevertheless, it is recognized as a masterpiece.
If today it goes to open auction, collectors will buy it for 140 million $!
How did this “misunderstanding” arise? The primitive image by all art critics of the world is recognized as a masterpiece. Did they conspire?
Obviously, there is something special about The Black Square. Invisible to the ordinary viewer. Let’s try to discover this “something”.
1. The Black Square is not as simple as it seems
It only at first glance seems that such a masterpiece could be created by everyone: both a child and an adult without art education.
The child would not have the patience to paint such a large surface with one color.
But seriously, an adult would hardly be able to repeat The Black Square, because not everything in this picture is so simple.
The Black Square is NOT really black
The Black Square is not really a square. Its sides are NOT equal to each other. And the opposite sides are NOT parallel to each other.
In addition, the Black Square is NOT completely black.
Chemical analysis showed that Malevich used three home-made paints. The first is burnt bone. The second is black ocher. And the third is another natural component … a dark green hue.
Malevich also added chalk to remove the gloss effect of oil paints.
That is, the artist did not just take the first black paint and draw the square. At least he spent a day preparing materials.
There are four Black Squares
If it were an accidentally painted picture, the artist would not copy it. Over the next 15 years, he created 3 more Black Squares.
If you saw all 4 paintings (two are stored in the Tretyakov Gallery, one in the Russian Museum and one more in the Hermitage), then you probably noticed how much they are NOT similar.
Yes-Yes. Despite all their simplicity, they are different. The first Square of 1915 (4) is considered the most energetically charged. The thing is in the successful selection of shades of black and white, as well as in the composition of colors.
All four paintings are similar in size and color. One of the Squares is larger in size (1923 year of creation, stored in the Russian Museum, 3).
The other is much blacker. By color, it is the most deaf and all-consuming (also stored in the Tretyakov Gallery, 1).
Below are all four Squares. The difference in reproductions is difficult to understand. But maybe it will inspire you to go to Russia and see them live!
1. Black Square. 1929. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. 2. Black square. 1930-1932. Hermitage, St. Petersburg. 3. Black Square. 1923. Russian Museum, St. Petersburg. 4. Black Square. 1915. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.
The Black Square closes two more paintings
On the Square in 1915, you probably noticed cracks (craquelure). The bottom layer of paint is visible through it. These are the colors of a different picture. It was written in protosuprematist style. Something like “Ladies by the lamppost.”
That’s not all. Below it is another image. Already the third in a row. Written in the style of cubofuturism. This is how this style looks like.
Therefore, craquelures appeared. Too thick paint.
Why such difficulties? As many as three images on one surface!
Perhaps this is an accident. It happens. The artist has an idea. He wants to express it right away. But there may not be a canvas at hand. But even if there is a canvas, it needs to be prepared, primed. Then insignificant pictures are used. Or those that the artist considers unsuccessful.
It turned out a kind of picturesque nesting doll. Evolution. From cubo-futurism to cubo-suprematism and to pure suprematism in the Black Square.
2. Strong theory of a strong personality
Malevich came up with a new direction in painting: Suprematism. The Black Square was created as part of this direction.
Supreme means excellent. Since the artist considered it the highest point in the development of painting.
This is a whole school. Like impressionism. Like academism. Only this school was created by one person. Kazimir Malevich. He attracted many supporters and followers.
Malevich was able to clearly and charismatically talk about his brainchild. He urged to completely abandon figurativeness, that is, from the image of objects. Suprematism is an art that creates, not repeats, as the artist said.
If we remove the pathos and look at his theory from the side, then we cannot but recognize its greatness. Malevich, as befits a genius, felt in which direction the wind was blowing.
The time of individual perception was running out. What did that mean? Previously, only a select few admired works of art. Those who owned it. Or could afford to visit the museum.
Now came the age of mass culture, built on simplified forms and pure colors.
Malevich understood that art should not lag behind. Or maybe even able to lead this movement.
He invented, in fact, a new pictorial language. Proportional to the coming time, which is about to come. And the language has its own alphabet.
The Black Square is the main sign of this alphabet. “Zero forms”, as Malevich said.
Before Malevich, there was another alphabet invented by Giotto at the beginning of the XIV century. This alphabet was the basis of all art. This is a perspective, volume, emotional expressiveness.
Malevich has a completely different language. Simple forms in which color is given a different role. It is not to convey nature. And not to create the illusion of volume. It is expressive in itself.
The Black Square is the main “letter” in the new alphabet. Square, because it is the first form. Black color because it absorbs all colors.
Together with the Black Square, Malevich creates the Black Cross and the Black Circle. Simple elements. But they are also derivatives of the black square.
A circle appears if the square is rotated on a plane. The cross consists of several squares.
Then Malevich from his alphabet adds new “words”. It combines color forms in simple, complex and very complex combinations.
Malevich worked in the style of Suprematism for several years. And then the incredible happened. He denied figurativeness for so long that … he returned to it.
One could regard this as inconsistency. Like, “played” a beautiful theory and that’s enough.
In fact, this language wanted to be used in the world of forms. And Malevich obediently returned to this world. But portrayed him using the new language of Suprematism.
So the Black Square is not the end of art, as it is sometimes called. This is the beginning of a contemporary art.
Then came a new stage. Language wanted to serve people. And it passed into our lives.
3. A huge impact on living space
Having created Suprematism, Malevich did everything so that it would not gather dust in museums, but would go to the masses.
He drew sketches of dresses. But during his life he was able to “put it on” only on the heroes of his paintings.
He also painted porcelain. He created patterns for fabrics.
Malevich’s supporters spoke in the language of Black Square. The most famous of them is El Lissitzky, who invented printed fonts, as well as a new book design.
He was inspired by the theory of Suprematism and the Black Square by Malevich.
This design of books seems natural to us. But only because Malevich’s style has firmly entered our lives.
Our contemporaries – designers, architects and fashion designers, admit that they often find inspiration in the works of Malevich. Among them is one of the most famous architects, Zaha Hadid (1950—2016).
4. Why The Black Square is perplexing, but still a masterpiece
Almost every viewer tries to understand Malevich with the help of a familiar language. The language of the naturalistic image that Giotto invented in the 14th century and which was subsequently developed by Renaissance artists.
Many are trying to evaluate Black Square by inappropriate criteria. Like – not like. Beautiful – not beautiful. Realistic – not realistic.
Awkwardness appears. Discouragement. Because The Black Square remains deaf to such estimates. What is left? Only condemn or ridicule.
Nonsense. “The child will draw better” or “I can do that too” and so on.
Now evaluate The Black Square as the letter of the alphabet. Like an atom of a molecule. Like an electron of a magnetic field.
Then it will become clear why this is a masterpiece. It is impossible to evaluate The Black Square on its own. But only with the space that he serves.
Malevich was famous during his lifetime. But he did not receive material benefits from this. Once he decided to attend an exhibition in Paris (1929). And he asked the authorities to let him go there … on foot. Because he had no money for the road.
The authorities realized that an artist who came to the exhibition on foot would undermine their authority. Therefore, 40 rubles were allocated for the trip.
But after 2 weeks he was urgently called by telegram back. And on arrival he was immediately arrested. On a denunciation. Like a German spy.
No more shows. No Suprematism. In the USSR, only socialist realism is possible.
The artist died of cancer in 1935.